您的位置: 首页 » 法律资料网 » 法律法规 »

Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and Drug Administration

时间:2024-07-22 20:08:35 来源: 法律资料网 作者:法律资料网 阅读:9284
下载地址: 点击此处下载

Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and Drug Administration

Commissioner of SFDA


Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and Drug Administration



(SFDA Decree No. 21)

The Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and Drug Administration, adopted at the executive meeting of the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) on November 18, 2005, is hereby promulgated and shall go into effect as of the date of promulgation.


Shao Mingli
Commissioner of SFDA
November 18, 2005





Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and
Drug Administration


Chapter 1 General Provisions

Article 1 This Procedure is formulated for the purpose of effective prevention, timely control and elimination of the hazards of public health emergencies to ensure the health and safety of the public in accordance with the Drug Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Regulations for Implementation of the Drug Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, Regulations on Preparedness for and Response to Emergent Public Health Hazards, and other relevant laws and regulations.

Article 2 The special review and approval procedure for drug registration refers to the procedure and requirements of the State Food and Drug Administration to carry out special review and approval of drugs for handling public heath emergencies under the principle of unified leadership, early involvement, expeditiousness and efficiency, and scientific review and approval, in an effort to approve drugs for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies as soon as possible under the threat or after the occurrence of public heath emergencies.

Article 3 The State Food and Drug Administration may, according to law, decide to follow the Procedure to conduct special review and approval of drugs for public health emergencies in any of the following circumstances:
(1) Where the President of the People’s Republic of China declares a state of emergency or the State Council decides that certain areas within a province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the Central Government are in a state of emergency;
(2) Where the contingency program for public health emergencies is initiated according to law;
(3) Where the drug reserve department or the health administrative department of the State Council proposes a special review and approval for drugs having existing national drug standard;
(4) Other circumstances applicable to special review and approval.

Article 4 The State Food and Drug Administration is responsible for the review and approval of clinical trials, production and importation of drugs for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies.

The (food and) drug regulatory department of a province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall, upon entrustment of the State Food and Drug Administration, be responsible for on-site inspection and sampling of the pilot products of the drugs for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies.


Chapter 2 Application Acceptance and On-site Inspection

Article 5 Where the special review and approval procedure for drug registration is initiated, the State Food and Drug Administration is responsible for the acceptance of registration applications for drugs for public health emergencies.

Where a drug or a preventive biological product for public health emergencies has not been marketed in China, the applicant shall, before submission of the registration application, provide the State Food and Drug Administration with relevant research and development information.

Article 6 The applicant shall submit a registration application with relevant technical dossier to the State Food and Drug Administration according to the relevant provisions and requirements on administration of drug registration.

The registration application for drug for public health emergencies may be submitted in electronic form.

Article 7 Before submitting an application for registration, the applicant may provide a feasibility assessment application with general information and relevant explanations. The State Food and Drug Administration shall only comment on the scientific rationality and feasibility of the drug project, and respond within 24 hours.

The response to a feasibility assessment application shall be neither deemed as the review and approval opinion nor legally binding on the review and approval result of a registration application.

Article 8 The State Food and Drug Administration shall organize an expert group to evaluate and review the registration application for drug for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies, make a decision within 24 hours on whether or not to accept the application, and notify the applicant.

Article 9 Where a registration application is accepted, the State Food and Drug Administration shall organize technical review of submitted dossier within 24 hours and at the same time notify the (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the Central Government where the applicant is located to conduct an on-site inspection on drug research and development conditions, and organize sampling and testing of pilot products.

The (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall, within five days, submit the on-site inspection result and relevant opinion to the State Food and Drug Administration.

Article 10 The (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall organize staff from the departments of drug registration, drug safety and inspection, etc. to participate in the on-site inspection.

The National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products shall be notified to send staff to participate in the on-site inspection and sampling of preventive biological products.

Article 11 For drugs that have existing national standards for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies, the State Food and Drug Administration may directly review and approve the drug in accordance with the relevant provisions in Chapter 6 of the Procedure when it deems there is no need for a clinical trial in accordance with law.

Article 12 With respect to the registration application for a specific vaccine, where only the original virus strain used in the manufacturing is changed while the manufacturing processes or quality specifications are maintained, the State Food and Drug Administration shall make a decision on whether or not to grant the approval within three days after verifying the changed strain used in the manufacturing.


Chapter 3 Testing for Registration

Article 13 After receiving the samples taken by the (food and) drug regulatory department of a province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government, the drug testing institution shall immediately organize verification of specifications and laboratory testing on the samples.

The drug testing institution shall complete the testing within the time frame for the drug being applied.

Article 14 For a drug applied first time for marketing, the State Food and Drug Administration may, when necessary, make early involvement by appointing the National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products to communicate with the applicant prior to testing for registration so as to timely resolve technical problems which may arise in the process of quality specifications verification and laboratory testing.

With respect to preventive biological products used to prevent and control the epidemic of serious infectious diseases, the State Food and Drug Administration may, depending on the situation, allow the testing for registration and the manufacturer’s self-testing to be performed in parallel.

Article 15 After completion of the specifications verification and laboratory testing on a drug, the drug testing institution shall, within two days, issue its verification opinion and submit it along with the drug test report to the State Food and Drug Administration.


Chapter 4 Technical Review

Article 16 The State Food and Drug Administration shall, within 15 days after acceptance of the registration application for drug for the prevention and treatment in public health emergencies, complete the first round of technical review.

Article 17 Where the State Food and Drug Administration considers that additional data are needed, it shall immediately inform the applicant of the content and timeline.

Where the applicant submits the supplementary data within the specified timeline, the State Food and Drug Administration shall complete the technical review within three days, or, depending on the situations, organize another review meeting within five days, and then complete the review report within two days.


Chapter 5 Clinical Trial

Article 18 Where the technical review is completed, the State Food and Drug Administration shall, within three days, complete the administrative examination, make a decision and inform the applicant.

Where the State Food and Drug Administration decides to approve a clinical trial, it shall issue a Drug Clinical Trial Approval. Where it decides not to approve, it shall issue a Disapproval Notice with reasons.

Article 19 Where an applicant obtains a clinical trial approval, it shall conduct the trial strictly following the relevant requirements in the approval document, and comply with the Good Clinical Practice.

Article 20 Drug clinical trials shall be conducted in institutions legally certified for drug clinical trials. If a clinical trial has to be conducted by an institution not yet certified, a special approval by the State Food and Drug Administration should be obtained.

The application for a clinical trial conducted by an institution not yet certified for drug clinical trials may be submitted along with the application for drug registration.

Article 21 The investigator responsible for a drug clinical trial shall, in accordance with the relevant provisions, timely report adverse events occurred in the process of the clinical trial to the State Food and Drug Administration. If no adverse event occurs, the investigator shall collect relevant information and report to the State Food and Drug Administration monthly.

Article 22 The State Food and Drug Administration shall, in accordance with law, supervise and inspect the clinical trials of drugs for public health emergencies.


Chapter 6 Review, Approval and Monitoring of Drug Production

Article 23 The applicant shall, after completion of the drug clinical trials, submit the relevant data to the State Food and Drug Administration in accordance with the Provisions for Drug Registration.

Article 24 The State Food and Drug Administration shall, within 24 hours after receiving data submitted by the applicant, organize technical review, and at the same time notify the (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government where the applicant is located to conduct the on-site inspection on the drug manufacturing conditions, and organize the sampling and testing of pilot products.

The (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall, within five days, submit the result and opinion of the on-site inspection to the State Food and Drug Administration.

Article 25 Any newly-established drug manufacturer or manufacturer with newly-built manufacturing workshops or newly-added dosage forms for production may apply to the State Food and Drug Administration for a certificate of the Good Manufacturing Practice along with the application for drug registration. The State Food and Drug Administration shall, when conducting the drug registration review, immediately carry out an inspection on the Good Manufacturing Practice certification.

Article 26 The drug testing institution shall, after receiving the samples of three batches taken by the (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government, immediately arrange the testing.

Upon completion of testing, the drug testing institution shall, within two days, complete the test report and submit it to the State Food and Drug Administration.

Article 27 The State Food and Drug Administration shall carry out technical review in accordance with Chapter 4 of the Procedure, and shall, within three days after the completion of the technical review, complete the administrative examination, make a decision and inform the applicant.
Where the State Food and Drug Administration decides to approve the drug, it shall issue the Letter of Approval for Drug Registration, and may grant an approval number for the drug at the same time if the applicant has appropriate manufacturing conditions; if it decides to disapprove the manufacturing, it shall issue a Disapproval Notice with reasons.

Article 28 Where a drug manufacturer or distributor, or a medical and health institution finds any new or serious adverse drug reaction or cluster adverse reaction relating to a specially approved drug for public health emergencies, it shall immediately report the case to the local (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government, the health administrative department at the provincial level and the professional institution for adverse drug reactions monitoring.

The professional institution for adverse drug reactions monitoring shall regard drugs specially approved for public health emergencies as critically monitored products, analyze the collected case reports in accordance with the relevant provisions and timely report to the (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government and the State Food and Drug Administration.

The State Food and Drug Administration shall reinforce the reevaluation of approved drugs for public health emergencies after they are marketed.


Chapter 7 Supplementary Provisions

Article 29 The measures for special review and approval of the medical devices for public health emergencies shall be separately formulated by the State Food and Drug Administration with reference to the relevant provisions of the Procedure.

Article 30 The Procedure shall go into effect as of the date of promulgation.





北京市人民政府关于修改《北京市科学技术奖励办法》的决定

北京市人民政府


北京市人民政府关于修改《北京市科学技术奖励办法》的决定

北京市人民政府令第222号


  《北京市人民政府关于修改〈北京市科学技术奖励办法〉的决定》已经2010年6月8日市人民政府第68次常务会议审议通过,现予公布,自公布之日起施行。

  市长 郭金龙

  二〇一〇年八月十三日

北京市人民政府关于修改《北京市科学技术奖励办法》的决定

  市人民政府决定对《北京市科学技术奖励办法》作如下修改:

  一、第六条增加一款,作为第四款:“市科学技术奖励工作办公室承担评审委员会的日常工作。”

  二、第七条修改为:“国家机构以外的社会组织或者个人利用非财政性经费设立面向本市的地方性科学技术奖项,应当向市科学技术行政部门办理登记手续。“社会组织或者个人经登记设立面向本市的地方性科学技术奖项,在评审、奖励活动中不得收取任何费用。”

  三、第十一条第一款修改为:“市科学技术奖分设重大科技创新奖、一等奖、二等奖、三等奖。其中,每年一等奖为30项左右,二等奖为60项左右。奖金数额由市科学技术行政部门会同市财政部门规定。”

  四、第十四条修改为:“各专业评审委员会负责对候选项目进行初审,根据市科学技术行政部门制定的评审标准和评价指标实行记名投票,提出奖励项目的初审结果。”

  五、第十五条第二款修改为:“市科学技术行政部门组织有关专家对奖励项目有异议的进行复审,并记名投票表决,作出复审意见,提交评审委员会。”

  六、第十六条修改为:“评审委员会根据奖励的重点,对初审结果和复审意见进行综合评议,并记名投票表决,提出项目获奖人选和奖励等级的评审意见。”

  七、第十七条修改为:“市科学技术行政部门对评审委员会提出的市科学技术奖的获奖人选和奖励等级的评审意见进行审核后,报市人民政府批准。”

  八、第二十六条中的“社会力量”改为“社会组织或者个人”。

  本决定自公布之日起施行。2002年4月11日北京市人民政府第93号令发布,2007年3月7日北京市人民政府第187号令修改的《北京市科学技术奖励办法》根据本决定修正后,重新公布。

北京市科学技术奖励办法

(2002年4月11日北京市人民政府第93号令发布

根据2007年3月7日北京市人民政府第187号令第一次修改

根据2010年8月13日北京市人民政府第222号令第二次修改)

  第一条 为了奖励在本市科学技术进步活动中做出突出贡献的个人和组织,调动科学技术人员的积极性和创造性,加速本市科学技术进步,促进首都的经济建设和社会发展,根据《国家科学技术奖励条例》等有关规定,结合本市实际情况,制定本办法。

  第二条 市人民政府设立北京市科学技术奖(以下简称市科学技术奖)。

  市科学技术奖用于奖励本市行政区域内对科学技术创新和发展做出突出贡献的组织和个人,重点奖励在本市国民经济和社会发展规划纲要确定的重点发展行业和科技发展重点领域中取得的技术成果、采取产学研联合创新机制研究开发并在本市实施应用的技术成果、拥有自主知识产权或者形成国家或者国际标准的技术成果等。

  第三条 本市科学技术奖励贯彻尊重知识、尊重人才的方针,鼓励自主创新、促进科学研究、技术开发与经济建设、社会发展密切结合,加速科教兴国和可持续发展战略的实施。

  第四条 市科学技术奖的评审、授予,实行公开、公平、公正的原则。

  第五条 市科学技术行政部门负责市科学技术奖评审的组织和管理工作。

  第六条 市人民政府设立北京市科学技术奖励评审委员会(以下简称评审委员会)。评审委员会下设若干专业评审委员会,依照本办法的规定,负责市科学技术奖的评审工作。

  评审委员会由政府相关部门主管科技工作的负责人和行业领域专家组成,其中行业领域专家比例不少于50%。评审委员会组成人员的人选,由市科学技术行政部门提出,报市人民政府批准,任期三年。

  各专业评审委员会由相关专业领域的专家组成,各专业评审委员会的人选由市科学技术行政部门确定。

  市科学技术奖励工作办公室承担评审委员会的日常工作。

  第七条 国家机构以外的社会组织或者个人利用非财政性经费设立面向本市的地方性科学技术奖项,应当向市科学技术行政部门办理登记手续。

  社会组织或者个人经登记设立面向本市的地方性科学技术奖项,在评审、奖励活动中不得收取任何费用。

  第八条 市科学技术奖的奖励范围包括:

  (一)通过原始创新、集成创新、引进消化吸收再创新取得的技术成果,应用于经济建设和社会发展,拥有自主知识产权,并取得较大经济效益或者社会效益的;

  (二)在产品、工艺、材料等方面研究开发共性技术和关键性技术,实施后取得较大经济效益或者社会效益的;

  (三)在转化、推广科技成果并使之产业化中,取得显著经济效益或者社会效益的;

  (四)在科学技术基础性工作和社会公益性科学技术事业中取得较大经济效益或者社会效益的;

  (五)阐明自然现象、特征、规律,在学术上有新见解,得到国内外学术界公认的基础研究成果,对科学技术发展具有重要价值的;

  (六)研究成果对推动决策科学化和管理现代化,促进科技、经济与社会协调发展起重大作用的;

  (七)外国组织或者个人同本市的组织或者个人合作研究、开发的重大科学技术成果;

  (八)对提高公众的科学文化素养具有明显成效的科普作品。

  第九条 下列成果不属于市科学技术奖的评审范围:

  (一)涉及国防、国家安全并由于国家安全和保密原因不能公开的成果;

  (二)正在研究且不能在其他领域应用的成果;

  (三)存在知识产权以及有关完成单位、完成人员等方面争议的成果;

  (四)已申报其他省(部)级科技奖励的成果。

  第十条 市科学技术奖每年评审奖励一次,由市人民政府颁发证书和奖金。奖励经费由市财政列支。

  第十一条 市科学技术奖分设重大科技创新奖、一等奖、二等奖、三等奖。其中,每年一等奖为30项左右,二等奖为60项左右。奖金数额由市科学技术行政部门会同市财政部门规定。

  对于完成取得重大经济效益或者社会效益的科技创新的组织和个人,可以授予重大科技创新奖。有关重大科技创新奖的评审事项,由市科学技术行政部门报市人民政府决定。

  第十二条 市科学技术奖单项奖励授奖人数一等奖不超过15人,二等奖不超过10人,三等奖不超过6人。获奖人员按贡献大小排序。

  重大工程类和重大推广类成果,依据单位申报,奖项可以仅授予组织。

  第十三条 市科学技术奖的候选项目由本市行政区域内的下列组织推荐:

  (一)国家及本市有关部门;

  (二)所在区、县人民政府;

  (三)市科学技术行政部门认可的其他组织和个人。

  第十四条 各专业评审委员会负责对候选项目进行初审,根据市科学技术行政部门制定的评审标准和评价指标实行记名投票,提出奖励项目的初审结果。

  第十五条 市科学技术奖初审结果实行公告异议制度。初审结果在市科学技术行政部门指定的媒体上公布,公告期为30天。公告期内对初审结果有异议的,可以提请复审。

  市科学技术行政部门组织有关专家对奖励项目有异议的进行复审,并记名投票表决,作出复审意见,提交评审委员会。

  第十六条 评审委员会根据奖励的重点,对初审结果和复审意见进行综合评议,并记名投票表决,提出项目获奖人选和奖励等级的评审意见。

  第十七条 市科学技术行政部门对评审委员会提出的市科学技术奖的获奖人选和奖励等级的评审意见进行审核后,报市人民政府批准。

  第十八条 市政府有关部门按照各自的职责协同做好市科学技术奖的评审监督工作。

  第十九条 获得市科学技术奖的组织,应当从实施获奖项目的收益中提取一定比例,奖励获奖项目的主要完成人员。

  第二十条 市科学技术奖的获奖人申请市科技计划项目时,在同等条件下,可以优先立项。

  第二十一条 市科学技术奖重大科技创新奖、一等奖、二等奖的获奖项目,符合国家级科学技术奖申报条件的,由市科学技术行政部门负责推荐。

  第二十二条 评审专家及相关工作人员应当遵守评审工作规定,不得与获奖候选人单独接触,不得透露评审项目的技术内容及评审情况;涉及当年申报奖励项目或者与申报奖励项目的组织或者个人有利害关系的,应当回避。

  第二十三条 对弄虚作假、剽窃他人成果等骗取奖励的,由市科学技术行政部门报经市人民政府批准,撤销其奖励,追回奖金和证书,并在相关媒体予以公布。

  第二十四条 评审专家及工作人员在评审工作中有弄虚作假、徇私舞弊以及其他违反评审规定行为的,由其所在主管部门依法给予行政处分;由市科学技术行政部门报经市人民政府批准,取消其评审专家资格。

  第二十五条 推荐单位提供虚假材料,协助他人骗取市科学技术奖的,由市科学技术行政部门取消其三年内的推荐资格,并在相关媒体予以公布。

  第二十六条 社会组织或者个人未经登记,擅自设立面向本市的地方性科学技术奖项的,由市科学技术行政部门予以取缔。

  社会组织或者个人经登记设立的面向本市的地方性科学技术奖项,在评审、奖励活动中收取费用的,由市科学技术行政部门没收其所收取的费用,可以并处所收取费用的1倍以上3倍以下的罚款;情节严重的,撤销登记。

  第二十七条 本办法自2002年5月8日起施行。1988年市政府发布的《北京市科学技术进步奖励办法》(京政发〔1988〕121号)同时废止。



齐齐哈尔市全民所有制企业经济责任审计暂行办法

黑龙江省齐齐哈尔市人民政府


齐齐哈尔市全民所有制企业经济责任审计暂行办法
齐齐哈尔市市人民政府第2号令



第一条 为保证全民所有制企业各种形式经济责任制的落实,根据国家和省的有关规定,结合我市实际情况,特制定本办法。
第二条 凡实行承包、租赁、参股、合资、联营等经营形式的市属全民所有制企业,均应按本办法接受审计机关对其经济责任履行情况的审计监督。
第三条 审计机关可根据企业实行经济责任制的不同情况,采取不同的审计形式。对重点企业可采取期初、期中、终结三段式的跟踪审计。
第四条 经济责任审计的内容:
(一)合同规定的经济指标完成情况;
(二)财务收支情况;
(三)盈亏情况;
(四)财产情况;
(五)专用基金的提取、使用情况;
(六)发包方按规定履行合同情况;
(七)需要审计的其它经济事项。
第五条 实行各种经济责任制的企业,在签订合同或达成协议后十五日内,应将合同或协议副本及财产评估表抄报审计机关;在合同或协议兑现、期满或双方同意中止执行时,须提前十五日向审计机关提请审计。审计部门须在接到提请三十日内实施审计。
企业厂长、经理离任审计,由组织人事部门向同级审计机关提请。
第六条 凡应进行经济责任审计的企业,其财产盘点必须清楚,会计资料必须完整齐全。
第七条 实行经济责任制的企业,其经营者不经审计,不得离任、晋级或给予重奖。
实行承包、租赁经营责任制的企业,不经审计,不得兑现、中止合同或更换承包(承租)人。
第八条 审计机关对企业经济责任审计结束,应依据在有关法律、法规和有关规定,作出审计结论或处理决定。
企业对审计机关的审计结论或处理决定有异议的,可在收到审计结论或处理决定之日起十五日内,向上一级审计机关申请复审。复审期间原审计结论或处理决定仍须执行。
第九条 经济责任审计工作,由市、县、区审计机关分别组织实施。对同级财政收入影响较大的企业,由同级审计机关负责审计;其它企业可委托部门审计机构或社会审计服务机构进行审计。
第十条 企业主管部门以及财政、税务、银行、物价等部门,应积极支持和配合审计机关,搞好企业经济责任审计工作。
第十一条 实行企业管理的全民所有制事业单位的经济责任审计工作,可参照本办法执行。
第十二条 本办法由齐齐哈尔市审计局负责解释,并根据本办法制定实施细则。
第十三条 本办法自发布之日起施行。



1989年5月13日